Sneak Preview

Last October, Laurie Halse Anderson was the keynote speaker at the Rutger’s One-On-One conference.  As you’d guess, she delivered a funny and insightful speech.  What you might not guess is that as she talked, she passed around a bag filled with daffodil bulbs, offering one each to whomever wanted to do a little gardening.  Apparently she’d over-estimated her enthusiasm for planting bulbs in the rocky woods surrounding her home (ordering way too many bulbs) and so decided to pass on the burden share the wealth with her fellow writers.

Well, I guess not everyone wanted to take a flaking flower bulb back home on the train, plane, or automobile, and there were leftovers.  The bag came around again and I got to select another bulb.

For the math-challenged, that means TWO bulb-cousins to Laurie Halse Anderson’s bulbs FOR ME.  Practically making us best friends, right?!

And here they are, on the eve of their big debut:

If they’d hurried up and bloomed already, they could’ve debuted alongside TWISTED.

Hair Today

Do any of you out there come home from the salon and put your head under the faucet so you can see what your new haircut will really look like in the hands of a rank amateur?   (You know, minus the products you never use, the blow dryer you never apply, etc.)

That’s my usual M.O. but today in honor of spring, my stylist threw me a curve:  after cutting my hair, she French braided it.

I don’t have the heart to destroy her lovely work. 

Guess I’ll wait until tomorrow to discover the reality of this latest cut.

Gals Write for Gals Read – ?


I bought this book at my son’s school book fair and everyone in the household (me plus the three males living here) has read at least portions of it.  (For those even more behind the times on their reading lists than me, GUYS WRITE FOR GUYS READ edited by Jon Scieszka (2005), is a compilation of stories/memories from 90 male children’s writers and illustrators, including our own[info]davidlubar). The project is part of Scieszka’s literacy initiative designed to encourage boys to read.

It’s a great book.  Now that I’ve finished all the stories, I plan on taking it to the library and looking up some of these writers’ books so I can expand our household reading horizons.

But . .

This book makes me wonder what a GALS WRITE FOR GALS READ compilation would look like.  Guys’ childhood experiences are by no means universal (okay, maybe farts are a common thread) yet there’s this underlying “guy code” in the book that makes every male a member of the club. Even those boys who weren’t classic guys’ guys knew what was expected of them, and while some didn’t speak the language, they all understood it.    

Would it be possible to have a gal edition of this book?  Do gals have a universal language?  Universal expectations? 

 While society does place all sorts of expectation on females, females have much more leeway than males in terms of sports (athletic girls are admired but it’s no big deal to be unathletic); the cars they drive (Hummers or VW Beetles are equally acceptable); the clothes and colors they wear (pants or dresses are fine, black, brown,  pink, purple – every color in the spectrum is okay); make-up (women are free to wear it or not but men are denied one of society’s greatest inventions – lipstick!).  In terms of careers, plenty of men are still intimidated by female doctors, scientists, and race car drivers, but there isn’t a majority unspoken opinion that a woman embarrasses herself by being, say, an astronaut.  However, there is a prevalent attitude that men shouldn’t be nurses or dancers.

I grew up with two brothers and two sisters.  I was a “tomboy” who threw a better spiral than most boys on the playground but also played with dolls.   I climbed trees and sledded, built forts, pushed my cat around in a baby buggy, played dress-up, had pinecone fights, sang into my hairbrush along with the radio, wore lip gloss, laughed at fart jokes, read books.

Maybe my childhood is a representative snapshot of what a GALS WRITE FOR GALS READ story would offer: girls exploring different interests and attitudes.        

And perhaps the GUYS WRITE participants would disagree with me, but as I read their stories I wished for a little more flexibility in their lives.  Opportunities for them to be true to the real guys inside, whether that meant jumping off barns, composing musicals, designing clothes, or Xeroxing their butts. 

Either way, I absolutely want that flexibility for my guys.

CALL-IN FOR PEACE –UPDATE

I received this message from Progressive Democrats of America (PDA):

Today (Tuesday) is our day to lead in the unified phone campaign to get Congress
to finally stand against Bush’s unending war in Iraq.

In the last few hours, we’ve learned of a possible amendment to Bush’s
supplemental Appropriation request for $93 billion more for Iraq.
The
amendment, written by our allies, would call for a fully-funded withdrawal of
U.S. troops within a set timetable.
This would mean that a vote for the
appropriation would be a vote against the war.
This is an exciting development –
a longshot, but worth fighting for.

So when we call our Congress members today, ask them to support a “fully-funded
withdrawal with timetable” amendment to the Iraq supplemental. But if such an
amendment is NOT adopted, insist that our Representatives vote NO on the
supplemental.

Our special toll-free number into Congress is 1-888-851-1879.

Don’t stop after calling your own Representative. To ensure that a “fully-funded withdrawal”
amendment comes to the floor for a vote, contact one or two members of the Democratic
leadership: Rep. Louise Slaughter (NY), Chair, Rules Committee (which decides
whether amendments get to the floor); Speaker Nancy Pelosi; House Majority
Leader Steny Hoyer (MD); Rep. Rahm Emanuel (IL); Rep. James Clybourn (SC). Make
your call(s) toll-free l-888-851-1879 -- or call 202-224-3121.

Thank you!

CALL-IN FOR PEACE Tuesday, March 6

Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) and its allies are coordinating a
unified phone campaign to get Congress to reject additional Iraq war
funding – the Bush supplemental appropriations request for $93
billion more. With the Democratic leadership signaling weakness and
half-hearted amendments aimed at undermining the escalation but not the
war, the coalition is phoning in a loud and clear message: NO MORE
FUNDING FOR WAR. VOTE NO ON THE SUPPLEMENTAL. BRING OUR TROOPS HOME.


Toll-free number into Congress is 1-888-851-1879.

Points to consider when calling your Senate and Congressional offices:

Most Iraqis – both Sunni and Shia -- want US troops out of their country and most
believe attacks on our troops are justified.

US military force is no solution in Iraq; diplomacy, not war, is the solution.

US public sentiment via the polls in November and in opinion polls expresses a
strong desire for the US to get out.

Congress has the Constitutionally-granted “power of the purse,” and the DUTY
to end the war by cutting off war funding, except what’s needed for the prompt,
safe, orderly withdrawal of all our troops.

The US must NOT build permament military bases in Iraq.

Please take several minutes to call your senators and representative.

The number is 1-888-851-1879.

Thank you.

Told You So

In my last post I mentioned my weird electromagnetic field that causes odd happenings whenever I get close to a computer.  Well, I just posted replies to four comments and my replies just landed in my email box.

What’s up with that?  Did you guys get my replies in your inboxes?

Blog Counters

DISCLAIMER:  I’m a total computer illiterate.  I can word process just fine (although it took some time to break the habit of hitting the Enter/Return key as if I were using a typewriter) and I’ve mastered Photobucket, but that’s about it.  Well, that plus I don’t share Senator Ted Stevens’ misconception that the internet is a series of tubes.  I do, however, have a weird electromagnetic field that causes my computer to freeze up and do all sorts of insane things never before witnessed by man.  Or so says my mate.

Anyway, here’s my situation:  I’m toying with the idea of putting a counter on this journal because it seems like a cool idea to know how many people stop by to read and where they’re reading from.  But I’m overwhelmed with the choices PLUS I’m a little freaked out by the info that can be gathered.  I was just reading the BlogPatrol site and it offers (among other features): Detailed Analysis. Information on your 10 most recent visitors, including date/time, IP, Browser, Operating System, and Screen resolution of visitors.

Does anyone else feel like this stuff is a bit Big Brother-ish?  Is everyone already doing this?  Am I the only naive person who hasn’t jumped on the info collection bandwagon?  I wouldn’t know what to do with this info but I guess others are making use of it somehow.  I mean, I like the idea of knowing where someone is reading from but how specific does it get?  (We’re not talking Bat Cave computer capabilities, are we?)

So here are just a few questions:

Do you use a counter? 
If so, which one? 
Why would you recommend it?

Do you feel weird using an invisible tracker/counter thingy that collects info without your readers’ consent?

Am I just stressing about something that I don’t need to worry about because (1) that ship has already sailed (2) I’ve already got a laundry list of worries keeping me up at night and (3) my time would be better spent finishing my revisions?

Stuck in Yuck

I’m close to finishing the second draft of my middle-grade but am writing a new chapter that’s needed (I think, anyway).  The first scene went well, writing-wise, but I’m writing another scene that just doesn’t know what it wants to be when it grows up.

Numerous times today I pushed away from the keyboard and stomped around the house, scaring the furry creatures, I’m sure, as I hoped for enlightenment.  When that didn’t come, I’d force myself back in the chair and write a few lines that conjured up nothing but feelings of loathing for the story and myself.  More stomping.  More eating.  More self-loathing.  Eventually I went downstairs and ran on the treadmill for twenty-five minutes.  Did I find enlightenment there?  No.  (But I did get in a good, solid training run).

Not sure what I’m asking for here but if any of you know what I need, could you please send it along?